Comments on A Philosophy of Strength and Health: Thoughts on Back Health

Mass isn't necessarily indicative of functional st...

2008-06-19T20:25:00.000-07:00

Mass isn't necessarily indicative of functional strength (isometric or concentric), control or coordination, so I think it is hard to say that more mass could confer an advantage, particularly with regard to the posterior torso muscles. It could be a disadvantage if normal segmental movement is limited with specific movement skills. It is unlikely to be a disadvantage with pure lifting tasks, but I don't think it necessarily confers an advantage; it just means that person gains mass more readily.

Hip mobility, or lack thereof, profoundly affects ...

2008-06-19T20:11:00.000-07:00

Hip mobility, or lack thereof, profoundly affects lower spine health over time. Excess spine movement and loading due to hip immobility is, in my opinion, a primary cause of back pain and dysfunction.

This may be a silly question, but I'm curious none...

2008-06-19T20:00:00.000-07:00

This may be a silly question, but I'm curious nonetheless:

Two people had identical "understanding the difference between spine flexion/extension and hip flexion/extension . . . [ability to limit] shear, torque and compressive forces over time, while maximizing strength and mobility of the lower extremities" would a person with greater posterior muscle mass be at an advantage compared to someone with less mass? Another possibly silly question is at what point could the extra mass be less advantageous if the quoted qualities were exceptional?

What are your thoughts on flexibility (or lack of)...

2008-06-19T19:19:00.000-07:00

What are your thoughts on flexibility (or lack of) - especially in the hamstrings and hip musculature as it affects lower spine health and movement?