Thoughts on Back Health

Those who think of hypertrophy around the lumbar spine as a marker of back health or view it as a training goal are misguided. Absolute spinal erector strength doesn't necessarily protect your back from anything; skilled movement patterns are more likely to do that. Back health (from a sagittal plane standpoint) is about control of torso orientation and alignment, while moving within the context of gravity. It is about understanding the difference between spine flexion/extension and hip flexion/extension. It is about limiting shear, torque and compressive forces over time, while maximizing strength and mobility of the lower extremities. Back health starts from the ground up, not in the back musculature.

Comments

climber511 said…
What are your thoughts on flexibility (or lack of) - especially in the hamstrings and hip musculature as it affects lower spine health and movement?
7:19 PM
Anonymous said…
This may be a silly question, but I'm curious nonetheless:

Two people had identical "understanding the difference between spine flexion/extension and hip flexion/extension . . . [ability to limit] shear, torque and compressive forces over time, while maximizing strength and mobility of the lower extremities" would a person with greater posterior muscle mass be at an advantage compared to someone with less mass? Another possibly silly question is at what point could the extra mass be less advantageous if the quoted qualities were exceptional?
8:00 PM
Tracy Fober said…
Hip mobility, or lack thereof, profoundly affects lower spine health over time. Excess spine movement and loading due to hip immobility is, in my opinion, a primary cause of back pain and dysfunction.
8:11 PM
Tracy Fober said…
Mass isn't necessarily indicative of functional strength (isometric or concentric), control or coordination, so I think it is hard to say that more mass could confer an advantage, particularly with regard to the posterior torso muscles. It could be a disadvantage if normal segmental movement is limited with specific movement skills. It is unlikely to be a disadvantage with pure lifting tasks, but I don't think it necessarily confers an advantage; it just means that person gains mass more readily.
8:25 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Form and Function

Image
Way back in 2002, I scanned these images by Howard Schatz from Sports Illustrated (October 14, 2002). A fascinating array of elite female athlete physiques, heights and weights, eh? These are some of the women featured in his book Athlete --a very cool pictorial essay that celebrates athletic form and function.
Read more

It's About Preparing People, not Preventing Injuries

ACL injuries do not happen in a void. People sustain injuries when their infrastructure is unable to manage a specific set of physical circumstances. To describe the mechanism of the injury without the context of the person and their level/type of sport, is to miss valuable insight. In sport, we prepare the person, to the best of our understanding, to meet the physical demands of that sport. We do not just work to prevent one particular injury; we prepare athletes to navigate the total sport physical environment. By "we" I mean the coaching and support staff -- specifically the athletic development staff.  Athletic development (AD) coaches prepare athletes through the development of physical literacy and movement competencies via movement progressions. It is more than strength, power, agility; it is the acquisition of knowledge, skills, abilities and behaviors to manage themselves within the entire sporting environment. At the higher levels of sport, AD coaches coordinate wit
Read more

The 411 on Back Angles and Torque When Squatting

The angle of the torso, when squatting, is not a function of whether or not the bar is high or low on the back. The angle of the torso (and thus torque on the spine) is primarily determined by the angle of the shin, a.k.a how much the ankle dorsiflexes. AND IN MY BOOK, THIS IS THE KEY TO BEST BACK TRAINING PRACTICES. GET IT??? MAKE YOUR QUADS, HAMS AND GLUTES DO THE WORK. If your shin is perpendicular to the floor, then your torso will incline forward to keep the CoM over your BoS, regardless of how low the bar is on your back. And your back will be forced to handle higher torque. A good, general rule of thumb, IMHO, is to keep the shins and the torso parallel, from an inclination standpoint. This could change with femur/torso length issues (tight adductors and hips in general can cause issues too), but this method is pretty good to help someone figure out whether or not they have decent ankle flexibility when squatting. And this will minimize torque on the back, as we will d
Read more